-- Posts Summary: Airlines and Airports operating and not operating --

A Boeing 737 MAX Test Flight Had Its Ups and Downs

User avatar
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 33256
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006

A Boeing 737 MAX Test Flight Had Its Ups and Downs

Unread post by bimjim » Thu Aug 08, 2019

https://www.wired.com/story/boeing-737- ... verso=true

A Boeing 737 MAX Test Flight Had Its Ups and Downs
Alex Davies

In the nearly five months since the Federal Aviation Administration grounded Boeing's 737 MAX, investigators have revealed a series of issues with the jet's software and raised questions about how the planemaker and the regulator allowed it to take off in the first place. The timeline for returning the MAX to passenger service remains murky, but that doesn't mean it can't fly at all. Monday morning, a Boeing-owned 737 MAX 7 took off from King County International Airport-Boeing Field near Seattle, climbing to 24,000 feet as it headed west to the Pacific Ocean, then due south. Over the next few minutes, according to tracking service FlightRadar24, the plane shed altitude and speed, until it was flying at about 13,000 feet and a lazy 250 mph, about 50 miles off the Oregon coast.

For the next two hours, the MAX slowed as it climbed, then sped up as it dropped, cycling between the two more than a dozen times. Its altitude fluctuated between 10,000 and 14,000 feet, its speed between 150 and 300 mph. All the while, it stayed in the same general area, far from normal air traffic, producing a flight path that resembled a pile of bent-out-of-shape paper clips. Then it climbed again, cruised back toward Seattle, and landed. (The FAA grounding order applied to MAX 8 and MAX 9 varieties of the jet; Boeing has yet to deliver any MAX 7s.)

This curious trip was a reconnaissance mission, but not to gather intel about anything on the ground. A Boeing spokesperson says it was an "engineering flight," conducted at the FAA's request, gathering data on the jet's performance. The spokesperson offered no details on what sort of data Boeing was after, but it's not surprising to see the test pilots imitating a yo-yo. The two MAX jet crashes-on Lion Air in October and Ethiopian Airlines in March, which together killed 346 people-happened just minutes into each flight, while the planes were climbing to their cruising altitude. The MCAS system, designed to automatically predict and prevent stalls by pointing the nose downward, kicked in when it shouldn't have, plunging the planes toward the earth.

Whatever fix Boeing devises will have to address how MCAS works and interacts with related systems, ensuring that MCAS only activates when a stall is in fact imminent. Monday's flight was likely a chance for the pilots to run through a series of potential failures. That means answering a lot of "what if" questions, says Pete Field, an aviation consultant and former Navy test pilot. "What if this part fails, how's that going to affect it?" That lets Boeing's engineers see how the plane's software reacts to different types of bad information, from airspeed to temperature to altitude. The most important might be the plane's angle of attack. That sensor appears to have malfunctioned on the Lion Air and Ethiopian flights, and had been a persistent problem for the MAX jet, CNN reported.

Field compares Monday's flight to examining a witness in a courtroom: You only ask questions whose answers you already know. The maneuvers the Boeing pilots executed would have been tested in simulation first, to produce a good idea of what a real plane would do, and ensure no more lives were risked. If the plane had dropped more than expected, flying at about 10,000 feet would give the pilots ample time to recover, Field says.

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg has said he expects that by the end of the year, the FAA will approve his company's fix for the troubled jet, which involves a fundamental redesign of the software system, The Seattle Times reported. But before it can take off with passengers aboard, expect a few more up-and-down flights like this one.

Post Reply

Return to “Boeing and "greed is bad"...”